Ramos v. Farrell et al
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION adopting 12 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 6/16/2018. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
RAMON RAMOS, #1384334
§
VS.
§
TDCJ MICHAEL UNIT, et al.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv820
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiff Ramon Ramos, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice proceeding
pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged violations of
his constitutional rights. The lawsuit was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) as well as the Amended Order for the Adoption of
Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.
After a review of the pleadings, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, (Dkt. #12),
recommending that Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, for Plaintiff’s
failure to obey an order of the Court. A copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff at his address;
return receipt requested. The docket shows that Plaintiff received a copy of the Report before July
20, 2017. (Dkt. #13). However, to date, no objections to the Report have been filed.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings,
conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review
of the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the
district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir.
1996) (en banc).
1
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate Judge.
Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See
United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918, 109 S.Ct. 3243
(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is
“clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly it is
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #12), is ADOPTED as the
opinion of the Court. Further, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil rights lawsuit is DISMISSED without prejudice. Finally,
it is
ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby
DENIED.
So Ordered and Signed
Jun 16, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?