Bowers v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. A COA is denied. All motions not previously ruled on are denied. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 6/29/16. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADAM HEATH GARRON BOWERS § VS. § DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Petitioner Adam Heath Garron Bowers, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be denied. Petitioner has filed objections. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #15) is ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further 1 ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 29th day of June, 2016. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?