Pak v. Recio et al
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court hereby ADOPTS 18 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. All claims by Plaintiff against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 08/24/16. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
CHARLES W. PAK
Plaintiff,
V.
MATTHEW RECIO, ET AL.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-102
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is Plaintiff Charles W. Pak’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint.
(Doc. No. 12.) Magistrate Judge John D. Love filed a Report and Recommendation that contains
his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the sua sponte dismissal of this action
with prejudice on July 21, 2016. (Doc. No. 18.) Given that no objections to the Report and
Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period, the Court hereby ADOPTS
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, all of Plaintiff’s claims against
the following Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Matthew Recio, Sarah A. Starnes,
Dale Starnes, John Trube, Ricardo Reyes, and Minerva Tovar. To the extent Plaintiff intended to
include the following as Defendants, Plaintiff’s claims against them are also DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE: Unknown Arriaga, Unknown Gamez, Unknown Garcia, Unknown House, Unknown
Mireles, Wana Recio, Gary House, Chris Cavallo, John Mireles, Melissa Mireles, Krystal Hodge,
Tyler Police Department, Unknown Mother Frances Hospital Employee, Unknown Smith County
Sheriff's Deputies, and Unknown Tyler Police Officers. As no Defendants remain in this action, it is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
SIGNED this 24th day of August, 2016.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?