Pak v. Recio et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court hereby ADOPTS 18 the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. All claims by Plaintiff against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 08/24/16. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CHARLES W. PAK Plaintiff, V. MATTHEW RECIO, ET AL. Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-102 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff Charles W. Pak’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 12.) Magistrate Judge John D. Love filed a Report and Recommendation that contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the sua sponte dismissal of this action with prejudice on July 21, 2016. (Doc. No. 18.) Given that no objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, all of Plaintiff’s claims against the following Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Matthew Recio, Sarah A. Starnes, Dale Starnes, John Trube, Ricardo Reyes, and Minerva Tovar. To the extent Plaintiff intended to include the following as Defendants, Plaintiff’s claims against them are also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Unknown Arriaga, Unknown Gamez, Unknown Garcia, Unknown House, Unknown Mireles, Wana Recio, Gary House, Chris Cavallo, John Mireles, Melissa Mireles, Krystal Hodge, Tyler Police Department, Unknown Mother Frances Hospital Employee, Unknown Smith County Sheriff's Deputies, and Unknown Tyler Police Officers. As no Defendants remain in this action, it is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED this 24th day of August, 2016. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?