Harper v. Roesler et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the sanctions imposed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 4/20/2016. (gsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DARRELL J. HARPER, #1957729
MICHAEL A. ROESLER, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv269
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Darrell J. Harper, an inmate confined at the Ellis Unit of the Texas prison system,
proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation
concluding that the civil rights lawsuit should be dismissed pursuant to sanctions imposed by the
Fifth Circuit. Plaintiff has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by Plaintiff, the Court is of the opinion that the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections by Plaintiff are
without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #5) is ADOPTED. It is
ORDERED that the cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by the
sanctions imposed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 20th day of April, 2016.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?