Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

Filing 10

ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Ordered that the Commissioner's 8 Motion to dismiss is granted and Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 11/13/2016. (bjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION DONALD R ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-00323-RCJDL Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On April 12, 2016, Plaintiff initiated this civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act, Section 205(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love who issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) be granted and Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 9.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed during the prescribed objection period. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. So Ordered and Signed Nov 13, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?