Reneau v. Spur 248 Steak, LLC d/b/a Steak N Shake et al

Filing 116

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 114 Report and Recommendations. All Defendants (with the exception of Spur 248 Steak, LLC, which is currently automatically stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362), are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 1/28/2019. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SEAN RENEAU, Plaintiff, v. TRUNG NGUYEN, VENKATA ALIGETI, JONATHAN BLAU, BLAU, LTD., EVERETT HOLLEY, JAYESH PATEL, § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-01126-JDK-JDL Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 9, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 114), recommending that all Defendants with the exception of Spur 248 Steak, LLC, which is currently automatically stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been presented for consideration within the prescribed time period for such objections. Further, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation de novo and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge included therein are correct. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 114) as the findings of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that all Defendants (with the exception of Spur 248 Steak, LLC, which is currently automatically stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of January, 2019. ___________________________________ JEREMY D. KERNODLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?