Regalado v. Bush et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE that all of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/4/17. (mrp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JOHN ALFRED REGALADO
GEORGE W. BUSH, SR., ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16-CV-1188
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is Plaintiff John Alfred Regalado’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint filed on
September 26, 2016. (Doc. No. 1.) On October 19, 2016, Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued
an Order for Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days from receipt of the
Order. (Doc. No. 5.) The Court received an Acknowledgment Receipt of the Order on October
21, 2016. (Doc. No. 6.) Although Plaintiff filed a Motion to Produce Court Documents (Doc.
No. 7), Plaintiff did not file an Amended Complaint as ordered. On December 7, 2016, the
Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that the above-captioned matter be
dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. No. 8.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation were
This Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s finding that Plaintiff has failed to follow
the local rules and prosecute his case. Additionally, Plaintiff has failed to plead facts plausibly
invoking grounds for the Court’s jurisdiction as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8.
This Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that Plaintiff would be unable to bring
a plausible claim based on the facts presented. Therefore, dismissal with prejudice is the proper
course of action.
Accordingly, this Court, finding no plain error in the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and
analysis hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. For the reasons
stated in the Report and Recommendation, all of Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH
So Ordered and Signed
Jan 4, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?