Sims v. RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED and complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 03/12/18. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
NATHALIE D. SIMS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
v.
ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE
SERVICING CORPORATION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1349
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of the case, has been presented for
consideration.
The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 40), filed on February 13,
2018, recommends that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 18) be
granted. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Because
no
objections
were
filed,
the
Court
reviews
the
Report
and
Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having reviewed the Report
and record evidence, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff has not
shown a genuine issue of material fact that the lien is void and has not shown a genuine issue of
material fact regarding her Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Texas Debt Collection
Practices Act (TDCPA) and Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) claims.
The Court therefore ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as
those of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Docket No. 18) is GRANTED and complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12th day of March, 2018.
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?