Garland v. Long et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's Notices of Requesting Dismissal and Motion to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 7, 8 and 10) are GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 03/01/17. (mll, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JASON LONG, et al.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:16cv1359
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of the complaint has been presented for
The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 11), filed on December 19,
2016, recommends that Plaintiff’s Notices Requesting Dismissal (Docket Nos. 7 and 8) and
Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10) be granted and that the complaint be dismissed without
prejudice pursusant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). The Court received an acknowledgment
of receipt revealing that Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation on February 10,
2017. No objections were filed. This Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's Report contains no
plain error and hereby ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of
the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Notices of Requesting Dismissal and Motion to Dismiss
(Docket Nos. 7, 8 and 10) are GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
SIGNED this 1st day of March, 2017.
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?