Hall v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and that the cause be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for proceedings consistent with this Court's opinion. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 1/7/19. (mrp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
KIMBERLY HALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-00377-RC
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Kimberly Hall filed the above-styled and numbered civil action pursuant to the
Social Security Act, Section 205(g), for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of her
application for Social Security benefits. The cause of action was referred to United States
Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the
decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and the cause should be remanded to the
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the
opinion of the Court. (Doc. No. 20.) The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his
proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been
presented for consideration.
Neither party has filed any objections. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is
accordingly ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the
1
cause be remanded to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for proceedings
consistent with this Court’s opinion.
So Ordered and Signed
Jan 7, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?