Coleman v. Gearheart & Gearheart CPA

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations. The Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Complaint (Docket No. 3) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/24/17. (mll, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CASANDRA COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. GEARHEART & GEARHEART CPA, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17-CV-00499-RWS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 11, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 10), recommending that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. According to the United States Postal Service, Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation via certified mail on September 16, 2017. Since that time, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having reviewed the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff has not alleged any activity proscribed by statute. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Complaint (Docket No. 3) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of October, 2017. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?