Dawson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 27 Report and Recommendations of the Unites States Magistrate Judge. ORDERED that the Petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 5/21/2019. (gsg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TIMOTHY ANTONIO DAWSON, #1987097 V. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:17CV670 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 8, 2019 (Dkt. #27), the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing his proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice and a certificate of appealability should be denied sua sponte. The Respondent filed objections to the report of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #28). The court, having made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Respondent thereto, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections of the Respondent are without merit. Therefore, the court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s report is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and a certificate of appealability is DENIED sua sponte. . SIGNED this the 21st day of May, 2019. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?