Johnson v. Texas Department of Public Safety
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Complaint (Docket No. 1 ) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 6/6/2019. (rlf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
SHERRY JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 6:18-CV-52-JDK-JDL
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Sherry Johnson initiated this civil action on February 5, 2018. Docket No. 1.
The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report
and Recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed without prejudice for
failure to prosecute. Docket No. 12. The Report and Recommendation was sent to Plaintiff at
her address of record and received on May 16, 2019. Docket No. 13. Plaintiff has not filed any
objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the prescribed time period for doing so has
passed. Indeed, Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court since the filing of her Complaint.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court agrees with the findings
and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Complaint (Docket No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED.
Page 1 of 2
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th
day of June, 2019.
___________________________________
JEREMY D. KERNODLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?