Robinson v. Meador et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 41 Report and Recommendations, and denying the motion for preliminary injunctive relief and temporary restraining order 39 . Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 6/17/2019. (mjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROYAL DOUGLAS ROBINSON, #02066342 § VS. § CHARLES O. MEADOR, II, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv207 ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiff Royal Douglas Robinson, an inmate confined in the Texas prison system, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #41) concluding that Mr. Robinson’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief and temporary restraining order (Dkt. #39) should be denied. Mr. Robinson has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Mr. Robinson, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections by Mr. Robinson are without merit. The court, therefore, adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the motion for preliminary injunctive relief and temporary restraining order (Dkt. #39) is DENIED. . SIGNED this the 17th day of June, 2019. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?