Williams v. Davis et al
Filing
102
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 67 Report and Recommendations and 68 Report and Recommendations, and denying 54 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Elliott Williams, 32 Motion for Protective Order filed by Elliott Williams, and 57 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Elliott Williams. Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/29/2019. (mjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
ELLIOTT WILLIAMS
§
v.
§
LORIE DAVIS, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv295
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the Plaintiff’s motion for
a protective order, construed as a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction,
be denied. The Magistrate Judge also issued a separate Report recommending that two additional
motions for injunctive relief be denied. The Plaintiff filed separate objections to each Report.
The Reports of the Magistrate Judge (docket no.’s 67 and 68), which contain proposed
findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of the Plaintiff’s motions, have been
presented for consideration. The court has conducted a de novo review of each of the separate
objections raised by Plaintiff to the Reports. The court concludes that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings and
conclusions of the court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (docket no. 32), construed
as a request for injunctive relief, and motions for preliminary injunctive relief (docket no.’s 54
and 57) are DENIED.
.
SIGNED this the 29th day of September, 2019.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?