Gonzalez v. Davis et al

Filing 74

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 69 Report and Recommendations. The motion for summary judgment of the Defendants Pam Pace and Pamela Willingham 54 is GRANTED and the claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because these are the last remaining Defendants in the case, it is further ORDERED that the lawsuit is DISMISSED in its entirety. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 01/06/21. (mll, )

Download PDF
Case 6:18-cv-00574-TH-JDL Document 74 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 662 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION RAUL GONZALEZ § v. § LORIE DAVIS, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18cv574 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-styled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending dismissal on October 22, 2020, and Plaintiff received it on October 27. He filed a motion for extension of time to object, which was granted until December 30, 2020. To date, however, no objections have been received. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment of the Defendants Pam Pace and Pamela Willingham (docket no. 54) is GRANTED and the claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because these are the last remaining Defendants in the case, it is further ORDERED that the lawsuit is DISMISSED in its entirety. All motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. SIGNED this the 6 day of January, 2021. ____________________________ Thad Heartfield 1 United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?