Tijerina v. Dingas et al
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 4 Report and Recommendations. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 7/14/2021. (ndc)
David Lee Tijerina,
Gregory Dingas et al.,
Plaintiff David Lee Tijerina, proceeding pro se, filed this civil
rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc.
On June 15, 2021, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice as
barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) unless the plaintiff paid the filing fee
within fifteen days. Doc. 4. Plaintiff subsequently filed a letter and
affidavit, which the court deems to constitute written objections.
The court reviews the objected-to portions of a magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate judge recommended
dismissal because plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and is barred by
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis. Doc. 4.
Plaintiff’s objection does not refute that basis for dismissal (Doc. 5),
and he has not paid the fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to file a
civil action in this court.
Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report de novo, and being satisfied that it contains no error, the court over-rules plaintiff’s
objections and accepts the report’s findings and recommendation.
This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
So ordered by the court on July 14, 2021.
J. C AMPBELL B ARKER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?