Sheppard v. Lucas et al

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. The present civil-rights lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice for the purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 11/9/2021. (ndc)

Download PDF
No. 6:21-cv-00380 Curtis Lee Sheppard, Plaintiff, v. Major Lucas et al., Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff Curtis Lee Sheppard, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against, among others, defendant Major Lucas pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s civil-rights lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice for the purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. Doc. 8. Plaintiff filed timely objections. Docs. 12, 13. When timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation are filed, the court reviews them de novo. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Here, plaintiff’s objections do not address the substance of the magistrate judge’s report: plaintiff’s accumulation of three strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act and sanctions imposed by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas for the repeated filing of frivolous cases. Instead, plaintiff levies ad hominen attacks upon the magistrate judge and the federal court system in general. These ad hominen attacks neither require nor deserve a response and do not demonstrate any valid basis for setting aside the report. Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s reports de novo, the court accepts the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff’s objections are overruled. The present civil-rights lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice for the purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis. All motions pending in this civil action are denied. So ordered by the court on November 9, 2021. J. C A M P BE L L B AR KE R United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?