Buckley v. Director, TDCJ

Filing 12

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 7/3/2024. (ndc)

Download PDF
No. 6:24-cv-00107 Leon Buckley, Petitioner, v. Director, TDCJ-CID, Respondent. ORDER This habeas corpus action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Doc. 3. On March 25, 2024, the magistrate judge ordered petitioner to either support his in forma pauperis application with the required trust account documentation or pay the $5 filing fee for this case within thirty days. Doc. 4. On April 19, 2024, the magistrate judge granted petitioner an additional thirty days to comply. Doc. 7. Petitioner did not comply. On June 5, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that petitioner’s case be dismissed without prejudice due to his failure to comply with the court’s order and satisfy the fee requirement for this case. Doc. 9. Petitioner timely filed a written objection. Doc. 10. The court reviews the objected-to portions of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Petitioner’s objection argues the merits of his underlying claims and asserts that he does not own stock or receive wages. Doc. 10. However, petitioner does not explain why he has failed to produce a certificate establishing the amount of money in his account as ordered by the court. He has, therefore, failed to comply with the court’s orders or to establish that he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report de novo, and being satisfied that it contains no error, the court overrules petitioner’s objections and accepts the report’s findings and recommendation. Petitioner’s case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by the court on July 3, 2024. J. C AM PB EL L B A RK ER United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?