Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does, Coffield Unit

Filing 11

ORDER accepting Report and Recommendations for 10 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 11/22/2024. (ndc)

No. 6:24-cv-00193
Curtis Allen Garrison,
Plaintiff,
v.
John Does and Jane Does, Coffield Unit,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff Curtis Allen Garrison, proceeding pro se, filed this
civil rights lawsuit (Doc. 1) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The
case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
On May 31, 2024, the magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to file
an amended complaint. Doc. 9. The order was mailed to plaintiff
at his last known address, which was the Allred Unit. He did not
file an amended complaint, nor did he file a motion for extension
of time to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that
the failure to comply with the order may result in the dismissal of
the case. Id. at 2.
On August 22, 2024, the magistrate judge entered a report
recommending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Doc. 10. The report noted that plaintiff had failed to comply with the May 31, 2024 order. Id. No objections have been filed.
When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir.
1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being
satisfied that the report contains no clear error, the court accepts
the findings and conclusions of the report. Accordingly, plaintiff’s case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
-1-

So ordered by the court on November 22, 2024.

J. C AM PB EL L B A RK ER
United States District Judge

-2-