Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 130

MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Nintendo's Renewed Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Remaining Patents-In-Suit by Nintendo of America, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc.. (Blank, James) Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2007 (djh, ).

Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Doc. 130

Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC

Document 130

Filed 08/02/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD. Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § Hon. Ron Clark § § § Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-00158-RC § § § § §

MOTION TO EXPEDITE BRIEFING ON NINTENDO'S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE REMAINING PATENTS-IN-SUIT Pursuant to Eastern District of Texas Local Rule CV-7(e), Defendant Nintendo of America Inc. moves the Court for an Order expediting the briefing of Nintendo's Renewed Motion To Stay Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Remaining Patents-In-Suit, Docket No. 125, which was filed Tuesday July 31, 2007.1 For all of the reasons set forth in Microsoft's Motion To Expedite Briefing, Docket No. 129, which was filed on August 1, 2007 and which Nintendo hereby joins, Nintendo requests that the Court set the following briefing schedule: · · · Any opposition brief to be filed no later than Monday, August 6, 2007 Any reply to be filed no later than Wednesday, August 8, 2007 Any surreply to be filed no later than Friday, August 10, 2007

1

In the renewed motion to stay, Nintendo requested this expedited briefing schedule. Docket No. 125, p. 1. After filing, Nintendo realized that Local Rule 9(3) appears to require a separate motion for an expedited briefing schedule, prompting this motion. Nintendo apologizes for any confusion caused by its unintentional failure to file a separate motion pursuant to Local Rule 9(e) on the same day as the motion at issue.

NY\1311700.1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC

Document 130

Filed 08/02/2007

Page 2 of 3

Dated: August 2, 2007 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ James S. Blank James S. Blank ([e-mail]) LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 885 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Robert J. Gunther, Jr. ([e-mail]) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Robert W. Faris ([e-mail]) Joseph S. Presta [e-mail]) NIXON & VANDERHYE, P.C. 1100 North Glebe Road 8th Floor Arlington, VA 22201 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Lawrence L. Germer [e-mail]) Texas Bar No. 07824000 GERMER GERTZ L.L.P. 550 Fannin, Suite 400 P.O. Box 4915 Beaumont, Texas 77704 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Nintendo of America Inc. 2
NY\1311700.1

Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC

Document 130

Filed 08/02/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV5(a)(3) on this 2nd day of August, 2007.

/s/ James S. Blank James S. Blank

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for Nintendo has conferred with counsel for Anascape in a good faith attempt to resolve without court intervention the matters raised by Nintendo's foregoing Motion to Expedite Briefing. Counsel for Anascape stated that Anascape opposes the motion.

/s/ James S. Blank James S. Blank

3
NY\1311700.1