Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 214

PLEASE IGNORE-ATTACHED TO DOCUMENT 212 -PROPOSED ORDER THAT GOES WITH 212 Joint MOTION Exclude Portions of Walter Bratic's Opinions As Admissible Under FRE 702Proposed Order< by Microsoft Corp.. (Joncus, Stephen) Modified on 3/4/2008 (djh, ).

Download PDF
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al Doc. 214 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD. Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Hon. Ron Clark Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-00158-RC ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF WALTER BRATIC'S OPINIONS AS INADMISSIBLE UNDER FRE 702 This Court, having considered all papers filed in connection with Defendant Microsoft's Motion To Exclude Portions Of Walter Bratic's Opinions As Inadmissible Under FRE 702, hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the following portions of Mr. Bratic's report are excluded and Mr. Bratic may not testify on these matters at trial: paragraphs 49, 76, 82, 89, 94, 102, 120, 134, 138, and 141; paragraphs 106-134; and Mr. Bratic's calculation of damages on the bundled controllers. CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?