Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al
Filing
299
NOTICE by Anascape, Ltd NOTICE OF SUBMISSION (Cawley, Douglas)
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al
Doc. 299
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION Anascape, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Microsoft Corp., and Nintendo of America, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 9:06-cv-158-RC
NOTICE OF SUBMISSIONS Anascape, Ltd. ("Anascape") hereby notifies all parties in the above referenced action that: i. On April 24, 2008, Anascape submitted (i) Anascape's Responses to Defendants' Objections and Counterdesignations to Plaintiff's Deposition Designations and (ii) Anascape's Responses to Defendants' Objections to Anascape's Trial Exhibits. These were submitted to the Court by e-mail through Ms. Chen. Opposing counsel was copied on the e-mail transmission. On April, 28, 2008, Anascape notified the Court by letter of its withdrawal of certain Plaintiff's Exhibits, its withdrawal of an objection to a Defendants' Exhibit, and its withdrawal of its opposition to certain of Defendants' Motions in Limine. This letter was submitted by e-mail to the Court through Ms. Chen and by overnight FedEx and facsimile transmission to the Court. Opposing counsel was copied on the e-mail transmission. On April 28, 2008, Anascape submitted a letter brief responding to Defendants' letter brief of April 25, 2008 regarding Walter Bratic's expert testimony. This letter was submitted by e-mail to the Court through Ms. Chen and by overnight FedEx to the Court. Opposing counsel was copied on the e-mail transmission.
ii.
iii.
NOTICE OF SUBMISSIONS
Dallas 255487v1
PAGE 1 OF 4
Dockets.Justia.com
iv.
On April 29, 2008, Anascape submitted a letter brief responding to Defendants' letter brief of April 28, 2008 regarding Dr. Robert Howe's expert testimony. This letter was submitted by e-mail to the Court through Ms. Chen and by overnight FedEx to the Court. Opposing counsel was copied on the e-mail transmission. On April 30, 2008, Anascape submitted a letter brief responding to Nintendo's letter brief of April 29, 2008 regarding additional claim constructions. This letter was submitted by e-mail to the Court through Ms. Chen and by overnight FedEx to the Court. Opposing counsel was copied on the e-mail transmission.
v.
NOTICE OF SUBMISSIONS
Dallas 255487v1
PAGE 2 OF 4
DATED: April 30, 2008
McKOOL SMITH, P.C. By: /s/ Douglas A. Cawley Douglas A. Cawley Attorney-in-Charge Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com Theodore Stevenson, III Texas State Bar No. 19196650 tstevenson@mckoolsmith.com Christopher T. Bovenkamp Texas State Bar No. 24006877 cbovenkamp@mckoolsmith.com Anthony M. Garza Texas State Bar No. 24050644 agarza@mckoolsmith.com Jason D. Cassady Texas State Bar No. 24045625 jcassady@mckoolsmith.com Steven Callahan Texas State Bar No. 24053122 scallahan@mckoolsmith.com McKool Smith, PC 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Sam Baxter Texas State Bar No. 01938000 sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com P.O. Box O, 505 E. Travis, Suite 105 Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 927-2111 Telecopier: (903) 927-2622 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ANASCAPE, LTD.
PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH P.C. Robert M. Parker Texas State Bar No. 15498000 rmparker@pbatyler.com Robert Christopher Bunt Texas State Bar No. 00787165 rcbunt@pbatyler.com Charles Ainsworth Texas State Bar No. 00783521 charley@pbatyler.com Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth P.C. 100 E. Ferguson Street, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: (903) 531-3535 Telecopier: (903) 533-9687
NOTICE OF SUBMISSIONS
Dallas 255487v1
PAGE 3 OF 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a) on April 30, 2008. As such, this notice was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). /s/ Steven Callahan Steven Callahan
NOTICE OF SUBMISSIONS
Dallas 255487v1
PAGE 4 OF 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?