Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 303

NOTICE by Anascape, Ltd PLAINTIFF ANASCAPE, LTD.'S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS (Cawley, Douglas)

Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Doc. 303

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD., PLAINTIFF, V. MICROSOFT CORP., AND NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF ANASCAPE, LTD.'S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Anascape, Ltd. ("Anascape") hereby serves it Supplemental Objections to Defendants' Deposition Designations pursuant to the Court's Order. Anascape expressly reserves the right to supplement, amend, or otherwise modify these designations based on circumstances as they may evolve prior to the commencement of trial. I. Anascape's Supplemental Objections to Defendants' Deposition Designations: Brian Carlson, 10/4/07 6:11-6:14 8:14-10:11 14:9-16 15:6-20 16:9-12 16:21-18:2 28:14-29:4 29:5-7 30:14-30:16 30:17-31:2 31:3-31:13 31:14-24 37:9-37:16 38:16-39:8 These exhibits are objectionable under Rule 403, as Armstrong's access to the GameCube controller at the time period when he was prosecuting the `700 Patent does not substantially support Nintendo's priority date argument, and encourages the jury to determine the priority date issue on inapposite facts. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:06-CV-158-RC

1
Dockets.Justia.com

60:4-60:15 61:6-61:13 62:6-63:11 63:15-64:7 66:24-67:11 68:12-19 68:20-69:22 69:23-70:4 75:22-76:5 76:16-76:21 77:17-78:10 85:12-85:21 88:8-90:16 90:16-25 91:9-91:25 93:8-93:11 93:12-14 93:15-93:18 93:19-23 93:24-94:12 95:7-95:13 95:14-96:6 96:7-96:14 97:8-97:20 98:10-98:16 98:17-99:7 99:8-99:12 101:16-102:4 102:5-103:12 104:13-104:20 105:17-106:1 106:8-107:2 107:14-23 127:19-129:1 129:2-129:19 130:1-133:7

These exhibits are objectionable under Rule 403, as Armstrong's access to the GameCube controller at the time period when he was prosecuting the `700 Patent does not substantially support Nintendo's priority date argument, and encourages the jury to determine the priority date issue on inapposite facts.

2

DATED: May 2, 2008

Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH PC /s/ Douglas A. Cawley Douglas A. Cawley Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 04035500 [e-mail] Theodore Stevenson, III Texas State Bar No. 19196650 [e-mail] Anthony M. Garza Texas State Bar No. 24050644 [e-mail] Jason D. Cassady Texas State Bar No. 24045625 [e-mail] Steven Callahan Texas State Bar No. 24053122 [e-mail] Christopher Bovenkamp Texas State Bar No. 24006877 [e-mail] McKool Smith PC 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: [phone] Telecopier: [phone] Sam Baxter Texas State Bar No. 01938000 [e-mail] McKool Smith PC 104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300 P.O. Box O Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: [phone] Telecopier: [phone] Robert M. Parker Texas State Bar No. 15498000 [e-mail] Robert Christopher Bunt Texas State Bar No. 00787165 [e-mail]

3

Charles Ainsworth Texas State Bar No. 00783521 [e-mail] Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth P.C. 100 E. Ferguson Street, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 Telephone: [phone] Telecopier: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ANASCAPE, LTD. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served on Defendants via email on May 2, 2008. /s/ Anthony M. Garza Anthony M. Garza

4