Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al
Filing
4
ORDER that Anascape propose a logical grouping of the patents, including no more than four patents in each group. This proposal must be submitted by August 25, 2006. The court will use Anascape's proposed groupings in determining how to best group the patents for the Markman hearing and other purposes. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 8/16/06. (kjr, ) Modified on 8/16/2006 (kjr, ).
<![CDATA[
Case 9:06-cv-00158-RHC
Document 4
Filed 08/16/2006
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP., ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-158
JUDGE RON CLARK
ORDER
On July 31, 2006, Anascape, Ltd. ("Anascape") filed a complaint alleging that Microsoft Corp. and Nintendo of America, Inc. have purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of its infringing products into the stream of commerce. In the complaint, Anascape listed a total of twelve patents in dispute. Given the complications of the differing claims at issue and to enhance administrative ease , the court orders that Anascape propose a logical grouping of the patents, including no more than four patents in each group. This proposal must be submitted by August 25, 2006. The court will use Anascape's proposed groupings in determining how to best group the patents for the Markman hearing and other purposes.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16 day of August, 2006.
___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
