Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 403

ORDER granting 402 Unopposed Motion to supplement the protective order. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/24/08. (djh, )

Download PDF
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION Anascape, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Microsoft Corp., and Nintendo of America, Inc., Defendants. ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff Anascape Ltd.'s Unopposed Motion to Supplement the Protective Order [Doc. # 402]. The court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following exhibits, which were introduced at trial or the post-trial hearing in the above-captioned matter, are not "Protected Material," as that term is defined in Paragraph 2 of the December 5, 2006 Agreed Protective Order [Doc. # 43] and are therefore not subject to the protections of that Order, notwithstanding any confidentiality designations that appear on the face of those exhibits: PX 1 PX 2 PX 4 PX 39 PX 43 PX 46 PX 47 PX 49 PX 52 PX 54 PX 108 PX 114 PX 117 PX 118 PX 192 PX 246 PX 249 PX 250 PX 263 PX 265 PX 309 PX 310 PX 311 PX 364 PX 400 PX 413 PX 413A PX 414 1 PX 414A PX 416 PX 416A PX 418 PX 418A PX 425 PX 426 PX 428 PX 440 PX 440A PX 447 PX 448 PX1001 PX1002 PX1003 PX1004 PX1005 PX1006 PX1007 PX1008 PX1009 DX 1 DX 2 DX 12 DX 12.1 DX 18 DX 22 DX 39 Civil Action No. 9:06-cv-158-RC JURY TRIAL REQUESTED Dockets.Justia.com DX 52 DX 86 DX 97 DX 99 DX 103 DX 104 DX 105 DX 106 DX 108 DX 115 DX 116 DX 116.1 DX 118 DX 120 DX 121 DX 123 DX 128 DX 133 DX 135 DX 136 DX 141 DX 142 DX 143 DX 157 DX 158 DX 159 DX 162 DX 164 DX 165 DX 167 DX 168 DX 169 DX 170 DX 171 DX 200 DX 211 DX 212 DX 214 DX 215 DX 216 DX 249 DX 293 DX 306 DX 308 DX 309 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24 day of September, 2008. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?