Parnell v. Director TDCJ-ID

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Petitioners motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 5 is denied. Because the Petitioner has paid the full filing fee, the denial of this motion shall notaffect the proceedings in this case. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 2/18/09. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ERIC STEPHEN PARNELL v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:08cv192 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Petitioner Eric Parnell, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. filed this application for the writ of habeas corpus complaining of the legality of his conviction. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges. On November 19, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Parnell's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the filing fee of $5.00. Parnell did not file objections to the Report, but has now paid the fee. The Court has reviewed the Report of the Magistrate Judge and has determined that it is correct. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (docket no. 5) is DENIED. Because the Petitioner has paid the full filing fee, the denial of this motion shall not affect the proceedings in this case. SIGNED this the 18 day of February, 2009. ____________________________ 1 Thad Heartfield United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?