Short v. Byrd et al
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 41 third motion for summary judgment, construed as a motion for reconsideration of the final judgment is denied. The Clerk shall refuse all further filings in this case from the Plaintiff Wesley Short except for a proper notice of appeal and filing fee payment or application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with a proper appeal. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 10/12/11. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
WESLEY SHORT
§
v.
§
ROBERT ALLEN BYRD, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:09cv214
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff Wesley Short, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C.
§1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. This Court ordered that the
matter be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3)
and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United
States Magistrate Judges.
Short’s lawsuit was dismissed for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court on
June 8, 2010. Short did not appeal this dismissal; instead, he has inundated the Court with pleadings
and letters, including no fewer than three motions for relief from judgment. On September 9, 2011,
the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Short’s third motion for relief from
judgment be denied and that the Clerk be directed to refuse all further filings in this case except for
a proper notice of appeal and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in conjunction with
this appeal. Short received a copy of this Report on September 16, 2011, but filed no objections
thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings,
conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review
of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court.
Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
1
The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report of the Magistrate
Judge. Upon such review, the Court has concluded that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is
correct. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (docket no. 42) is ADOPTED as the
opinion of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s third motion for summary judgment, construed as a motion
for reconsideration of the final judgment (docket no. 41) is hereby DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk shall refuse all further filings in this case from the Plaintiff Wesley
Short except for a proper notice of appeal and filing fee payment or application for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis in connection with a proper appeal. Any such pleadings, other than these, which
are received from the Plaintiff Wesley Short shall be returned to the Plaintiff or may be discarded
at the option of the Clerk.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 12 day of October, 2011.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?