Crawford et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant Allstate Texas Lloyd's 11 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is denied at this time, without prejudice to reassert. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 11/8/11. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION DARWIN CRAWFORD and CHARLOTTE CRAWFORD, Plaintiffs, v. ALLSTATE TEXAS LLOYD’S, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:10-CV-132 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is the defendant Allstate Texas Lloyd’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [doc. #11]. The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin for consideration of and recommended disposition on case-dispositive pretrial motions. On October 11, 2011, Judge Giblin issued his report and recommendation in which he recommended that the Court deny the motion to enforce the settlement agreement without prejudice to reassert. The parties have not filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report. The Court has received and considered the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. After review, the Court finds that Judge Giblin’s findings and recommendations should be accepted. Based upon the magistrate judge’s findings of fact and recommended disposition, the Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation on the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [doc. #23] is ADOPTED. The Court further ORDERS that defendant Allstate Texas Lloyd’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [doc. #11] is DENIED at this time, without prejudice to reassert. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8 day of November, 2011. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?