Williams v. Texas Dept of Criminal Justice ID

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM ORDER Regarding Transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 7/2/12. (tkd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
ROCKY BLAKE WILLIAMS

§

VS.

§

T.D.C.J. -I.D.

§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv277

MEMORANDUM ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER
Plaintiff Rocky Blake Williams, an inmate confined at the Gib Lewis Unit located in
Woodville, Texas, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division.
The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 (b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules
for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrates.
Analysis
Plaintiff complains that he has been inappropriately housed in administrative segregation
because he is considered a security threat.
The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not
contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28
U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th
Cir. 1973).
When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in
which the claim arose. The claims which form the basis of plaintiff's complaint occurred in Tyler
County. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Tyler County is located in the Eastern District of Texas. As
a result, venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas.

However, while Tyler County is in the Eastern District of Texas, it is in the Lufkin Division
of such district, rather than the Beaumont Division.1 When a case is filed in the wrong district or
division, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district
or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Kreimerman v. Casa
Veerkamp, S.A. de C.V., 22 F.3d 634 (5th Cir. 1994) (remanding the case to the Houston Division
of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, with instructions that the case
be transferred to the McAllen Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Texas pursuant to Section 1406(a)).
Accordingly, this case should be transferred to the Lufkin Division of this court. A Transfer
Order shall be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion.
Hello This is a Test
SIGNED this 2 day of
, 2012.
July

KEITH F. GIBLIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

This lawsuit was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The
court inadvertently transferred the action to the Beaumont division instead of the Lufkin division.