Texas Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Sebelius

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim 37 is GRANTED. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 6/24/13. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION TEXAS MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC. § v. § SECRETARY, DHHS KATHLEEN SEBELIUS § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13CV27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her findings, conclusions, and recommendation for the disposition of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim (document #37) has been presented for consideration. The Report and Recommendation recommends that the motion be granted and that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2013. Having made a de novo review of the written objections filed by Plaintiff, the Court finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections are without merit. The Court, therefore, adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as those of the Court. In light of the foregoing, it is Page 1 of 2 ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim (document #37) is GRANTED. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Any motion not previously ruled on is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24 day of June, 2013. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?