J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Allen
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court further ORDERS that J&J Sports Productions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #15) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/17/14. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARBARA ELAINE ALLEN,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 9:13-cv-105
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin
for consideration of and recommended disposition on case-dispositive pretrial motions.
On June 27, 2014, Judge Giblin issued his report and recommendation in which he
recommended that the Court grant in part and deny in part the motion for summary
judgment filed by Plaintiff J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
The Court has received and considered the report of the United States Magistrate
Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No party has filed objections to the
magistrate judge’s report. After review, the Court finds that Judge Giblin’s findings and
recommendations should be accepted. The Court ORDERS that the Report and
Recommendation on Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #18) is ADOPTED. The
Court further ORDERS that J&J Sports Productions, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. #15) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is
granted as to Defendant Barbara Elaine Allen’s liability for violating the
Communications Act. The motion is denied, however, as to Defendant Barbara Elaine
Allen’s alleged willful violation of the Communications Act and the amount of damages
that should be awarded. Those issues remain for trial.
So ordered and signed on
Jul 17, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?