Mendoza, Jr. v. Butcher et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 3/4/16. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ALVINO L. MENDOZA, JR.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13cv274
ASSISTANT WARDEN BUTCHER, ET AL. §
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Alvino L. Mendoza, Jr., an inmate at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled
lawsuit against prison officials.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends the action be dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review
of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff’s objections are without merit. For
the reasons set forth in the Report, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted. Additionally, to the extent plaintiff’s complaint may be interpreted as asserting a
malicious prosecution claim because the disciplinary charge was based on alleged false accusations,
plaintiff’s claim is also without merit. There is no constitutional claim based on the tort of malicious
prosecution for a prison disciplinary case. See Williams v. Dretke, 306 F. App’x 164, 2009 WL
62223 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, plaintiff’s claim is frivolous and fails to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A
final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s
SIGNED this the 4 day of March, 2016.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?