Brigham v. Anderson et al
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 3/28/16. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
JIMMY BRIGHAM
§
VS.
§
AARON ANDERSON, et al.,
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14-CV-120
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Jimmy Brigham, an inmate formerly confined at the Eastham Unit located in
Lovelady, Texas, with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division,
and represented by counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against
defendants Christopher Farrell, James Grounds, Glenn Jones, Johnny Patrick, Monique Hubbard,
Jimmy McDonald, Arthur Baskin, and Lee Martinez.1
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge,
at Lufkin, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The
Magistrate Judge recommends the defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.
1
Claims against defendants Aaron Anderson and Tyson Piel were dismissed by Partial Judgment on September
16, 2015 for failure to serve pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) (docket entry no. 28).
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2016.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?