Thomas v. Hancock et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 35 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/26/2017. (bjc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION THEODORE THOMAS § VS. § ELIZABETH HANCOCK, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv171 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Theodore Thomas, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment (docket entry nos. 23, 25, and 32) should be granted. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed and the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction should be declined. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the reports of the Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. So Ordered and Signed Sep 26, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?