Flores v. United States Attorney General
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Plaintiff is sanctioned $100 for the repetitive filing of frivolous lawsuits. This sanction must be paid before the Plaintiff is allowed to file any further actions in this district. Furthermore, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 7/30/15. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
ERIC FLORES
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GENERAL
'
'
'
'
'
'
9:15-cv-60
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, for pre-trial proceedings.
The court has received and considered the report and
recommendation of the magistrate judge, which makes two recommendations. (Doc. No. 8.)
First, it is recommended that the court impose a sanction of $100 due to the Plaintiff’s repetitive
filing of frivolous lawsuits. See also Doc. No. 19, Eric Flores v. United States Attorney General,
et al., 1:14-cv-198 (E.D. Tex. March 4, 2015) (declaring Eric Flores a vexatious litigant and
warning that “monetary sanctions may be imposed for future vexatious litigation”). Second, the
magistrate judge recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failing to comply
with a court order.
No objections were filed to the magistrate judge’s report and
recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed.
It is therefore ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc.
No. 8) is ADOPTED. The Plaintiff is sanctioned $100 for the repetitive filing of frivolous
lawsuits. This sanction must be paid before the Plaintiff is allowed to file any further actions in
this district. Furthermore, this case is dismissed without prejudice.
SIGNED this 30th day of July, 2015.
____________________________________
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?