Scott v. Crockett Independant School District

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. CISD's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Federal Rule 12(b)(6) 15 is GRANTED. Plaintiff Harry Scott may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified by the magistrate judge. Should Scott choose to amend his complaint, he must do so by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 12, 2016. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 7/28/16. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION HARRY FRED SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CROCKETT DISTRICT, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15-CV-00142-MHS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This case was assigned to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters pursuant to General Order 05-07. Pending before the court is Defendant Crockett Independent School District’s (CISD) “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Federal Rule 12(b)(6).” (Doc. No. 15.) The magistrate judge filed a report recommending that the court grant CISD’s motion. (Doc. No. 37.) No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Furthermore, the court’s independent review confirms that the magistrate judge’s analysis is correct. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. No. 37) is ADOPTED; and CISD’s “Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and Federal Rule 12(b)(6)” (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Harry Scott may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified by the magistrate judge. Should Scott choose to amend his complaint, he must do so by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 12, 2016. SIGNED this 28th day of July, 2016. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?