Mills v. Langley et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 7 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 6 Motion to dismiss the action is granted. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/4/2016. (bjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GREGORY JAMES MILLS
RICHARD LANGLEY, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15-CV-165
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Gregory James Mills, a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, brought this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Richard Langley, Mark Duff, Stephanie Seek, Taliesin Stern,
Diana Jones, and Natashia Cooper.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge
has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that
the action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,
and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 7) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss
the action (document no. 6) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in
accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
SIGNED this 4th day of May, 2016.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?