Gar-ner v. Management and Training Corporation et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss 4 is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 11/13/16. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION WILLI FREE I GAR-NER § VS. § MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORP., ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-8 § ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Willie Free I Gar-ner, a prisoner previously confined at the Diboll Correctional Center, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing this civil rights action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 9) is ADOPTED. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (document no. 4) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. So Ordered and Signed Nov 13, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?