Garner, I v. Walker et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM ORDER 4 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 6/2/16. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION WILLI FREE GARNER, I § VS. § STEVEN WALKER, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-32 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Willi Free Garner, I, a prisoner confined at the Diboll Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that plaintiff should be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and the action should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 4) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (document no. 2) is DENIED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. SIGNED this 2nd day of June, 2016. ____________________________________ MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?