Graves v. Gray et al

Filing 221

ORDER ADOPTING 216 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 7/28/20. (ljw, )

Download PDF
Case 9:16-cv-00170-RC-KFG Document 221 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3057 **NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION SCOTT W. GRAVES § VS. § DAVID W. MBUGUA, et al., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-170 ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Scott W. Graves, an inmate formerly confined at the Gib Lewis Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss his claims against defendant Janice Hanson (docket entry no. 216). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date. 1 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. A Partial Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. So ORDERED and SIGNED, Jul 28, 2020. ____________________ Ron Clark Senior Judge 1 Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on May 20, 2020 (docket entry no. 218).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?