Dodd v. Nacogdoches County Sheriff Department et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/29/16. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ROGER L. DODD § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-181 NACOGDOCHES COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., § ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Roger L. Dodd, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s civil rights action be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date. 1 1 Plaintiff filed correspondence with the Court which was filed as objections in error. A review of the correspondence reveals plaintiff requested his case be dismissed without prejudice as it was filed in error (docket entry no. 7). ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is PARTIALLY ADOPTED to the extent it recommends dismissal. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29 day of December, 2016. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?