Chaisson v. Eastham Unit Ad Seg Security et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/21/17. (ljw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EASTHAM UNIT AD SEG SECURITY,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-201
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND
ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Queronde Chaisson, an inmate formerly confined at the Eastham Unit with the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin United States Magistrate Judge,
at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The
Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining order and motions for
injunctive relief be denied.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleading. Plaintiff filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. This requires a
de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV.
After careful consideration, the Court finds plaintiff’s objections lacking in merit. As
outlined by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff was transferred to another unit which renders his motions
for injunctive relief moot.
Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED.
The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21 day of July, 2017.
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?