Chaisson v. Eastham Unit Ad Seg Security et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/21/17. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION QUERONDE CHAISSON § VS. § EASTHAM UNIT AD SEG SECURITY, et al., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16-CV-201 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Queronde Chaisson, an inmate formerly confined at the Eastham Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining order and motions for injunctive relief be denied. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleading. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the Court finds plaintiff’s objections lacking in merit. As outlined by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff was transferred to another unit which renders his motions for injunctive relief moot. ORDER Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21 day of July, 2017. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?