Lantrip, Sr. v. Morgan et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 10 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 9 motion to dismiss the action is granted. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/19/2017. (bjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION WILLIAM THOMAS LANTRIP, SR. § VS. § SHEYRL L. MORGAN, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-48 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff William Thomas Lantrip, Sr., a prisoner confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sheyrl L. Morgan and Ofelius Ovany. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the action without prejudice. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 10) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the action (document no. 9) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So Ordered and Signed Jul 19, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?