Garcia v. Bolton et al

Filing 98

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 5/9/19. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION PEDRO A. GARCIA § VS. § JOHN P. BOLTON, et al., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Pedro A. Garcia, an inmate formerly confined at the Polunsky Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants John P. Bolton, Sean R. Burks, Johnny R. Farris, Patricia Garney, and Joseph Smith. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends Defendant Burk’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted (docket entry no. 96). The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. 1 1 Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on April 4, 2019 (docket entry no. 97). ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. So Ordered and Signed May 9, 2019 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?