McCarty v. Sanches et al

Filing 64

ORDER ADOPTING 44 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants Greg Sanches, Zack Nick, Sammy Barden, Sergio Luna, Stephen Netherton, Chad Hooper, Adam Herrington, Garland Waggonner, Wacey Hartman, and Grimes are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 8/20/19. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION WILLIAM D. MCCARTY § VS. § GREG SANCHES, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17-CV-182 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff William D. McCarty, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Greg Sanches, Charles Dougherty, Zack Nick, Sammy Barden, Sergio Luna, Stephen Netherton, Ed Jones, Chad Hooper, Adam Herrington, Garland Waggonner, Wacey Hartman, and Grimes. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Greg Sanches, Zack Nick, Sammy Barden, Sergio Luna, Stephen Netherton, Chad Hooper, Adam Herrington, Garland Waggonner, Wacey Hartman, and Grimes. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 44) is ADOPTED. Defendants Greg Sanches, Zack Nick, Sammy Barden, Sergio Luna, Stephen Netherton, Chad Hooper, Adam Herrington, Garland Waggonner, Wacey Hartman, and Grimes are DISMISSED from this action. So Ordered and Signed Aug 20, 2019 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?