Beall v. Tracy et al

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 32 is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 9/25/19. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION DAVID BEALL § VS. § DR. RICHARD TRACY, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-2 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff David Beall, a prisoner previously confined at the Diboll Correctional Center, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dr. Richard Tracy, Janet Haney, Ganata Christian, and Kim Smith. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 43) is ADOPTED. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (document no. 32) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So ORDERED and SIGNED September 25, 2019. ____________________________ Ron Clark, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?