Flentroy v. Ngassa et al
Filing
11
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 4 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 6/22/2018. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
CHARLIE FLENTROY
§
VS.
§
ELIZABETH NGASSA, et al.,
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-42
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Charlie Flentroy, an inmate confined at the Eastham Unit with the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the defendants Ngassa, Moore-Lee, Roberts,
Pipkin, Davis and the University of Texas Medical Branch.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.1 It
has been over three months since the Report and Recommendation was issued and plaintiff has yet
to pay the $400.00 filing fee.
1
Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on May 22, 2018 (docket entry no. 9). Plaintiff
filed a Notice of No Objections to the Report and Recommendation.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in
accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22 day of June, 2018.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?