Johnson v. Purvis

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudicefor want of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case pursuant to this order of dismissal. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 12/19/18. (ljw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION CLAYTON EDWARD JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MILTON WAYNE PURVIS, COUNTY COMMISSIONER, Defendant. PCT 3 § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-00092-RC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE The District Court referred this civil action to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial management pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Plaintiff filed the above-styled action pro se. On October 26, 2018, Judge Giblin entered his report and recommendation (Doc. 4), recommending that the District Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claim for want of prosecution. Plaintiff confirmed receipt of the report and recommendation on November 6, 2018. (Doc. 5). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court conducted a de novo review of the magistrate judge’s report and the record in this cause. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and adopts Judge Giblin’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Court therefore ORDERS that Judge Giblin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is adopted. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case pursuant to this order of dismissal. So ORDERED and SIGNED December 19, 2018. ____________________________ Ron Clark, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?