James v. Lewis et al
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER overruling objections and adopting 3 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 11/20/2018. (bjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUFKIN DIVISION
MASON JAMES
§
VS.
§
BILLY M. LEWIS, et al.,
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18-CV-103
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Mason James, an inmate confined at the Eastham Unit with the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Billy M. Lewis, Bruce A. Johnson, and Kenneth
E. Hutto.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the records, and pleadings. Plaintiff filed
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. This requires a
de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV.
P. 72(b).
As outlined by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff makes no allegation that he was in actual
imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed this lawsuit. Plaintiff has also not
paid the full filing fee.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
So ORDERED and SIGNED November 20, 2018.
____________________________
Ron Clark, Senior District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?